Scheme depicts a revised layout of the floor plan and relating geometries. The scheme also attempts to direct the "user" through a pre-defined path that leads through the entry and offers a small glimpse of the object trouve. As the user walks through the transitional space, they are confronted with a the large space, that they can traverse through to its sub-space (still needs a little bit of work). The final destination is to the small space where the object trouve is located.
Plan:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Joe, what happened? You might have a more varied path to bring a visitor from the outside into the “inner sanctum”, the small space with the OT. But for my liking you ventured away from a clean composition with only a few geometry challenges to a non hierarchical convolution: all directions are equally important. The rectangle (formed by dashed lines in plan) and marked in one corner by a column makes no sense to me (and does not contribute to the solution for the problem at hand). I don’t quite understand the geometries of 1A and 1B and it si shard to comprehend them as one space. The AT is less clear than before, the LT is missing and the GT is a space between two spaces; it is not part of either space. There is no gradual or ambiguous about it.
i guess i was interested in trying to make a little more rhyme and reason out of the larger space, which began to effect the smaller spaces and transitions. i definitely feel that this was a step back, which is why i am going to work on the original layout and modify accordingly.
Post a Comment